Allow a single notify-zulip notification to send multiple Zulip messages #1791
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fmease
force-pushed
the
notify-zulip-multiple-messages
branch
from
c934d46
to
c4ac8c3
Compare
| )] | ||
| pub(crate) messages_on_close: Vec<String>, | ||
| #[serde( | ||
| rename = "message_on_reopen", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should all the renames be alias? I guess it doesn't matter for just Deserialize?
Mark-Simulacrum
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2024
RalfJung
added a commit
to RalfJung/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2024
…n-backport-nominations, r=GuillaumeGomez meta: notify #t-rustdoc Zulip stream on backport nominations In July '23, it was decided to handle rustdoc-specific backport nominations in t-rustdoc meetings going forward ([Zulip announcement](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/T-rustdoc.20backports/near/374828518)). However, t-rustdoc meetings are far too infrequent for them to address nominations on time (contrary to the weekly t-compiler meetings). Hence GuillaumeGomez and I came to the conclusion that {beta,stable}-nominated rustdoc PRs should be dealt with on a case by case basis, e.g. on Zulip. This PR attempts to partially automate this process. ~~Sadly, `triagebot` is not quite as flexible has I've hoped. Blocked on `triagebot` improvements (see the `FIXME`s in this PR).~~ (Fixed in rust-lang/triagebot#1791). r? GuillaumeGomez
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2024
…n-backport-nominations, r=GuillaumeGomez meta: notify #t-rustdoc Zulip stream on backport nominations In July '23, it was decided to handle rustdoc-specific backport nominations in t-rustdoc meetings going forward ([Zulip announcement](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/T-rustdoc.20backports/near/374828518)). However, t-rustdoc meetings are far too infrequent for them to address nominations on time (contrary to the weekly t-compiler meetings). Hence GuillaumeGomez and I came to the conclusion that {beta,stable}-nominated rustdoc PRs should be dealt with on a case by case basis, e.g. on Zulip. This PR attempts to partially automate this process. ~~Sadly, `triagebot` is not quite as flexible has I've hoped. Blocked on `triagebot` improvements (see the `FIXME`s in this PR).~~ (Fixed in rust-lang/triagebot#1791). r? GuillaumeGomez
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#116957 - fmease:meta-notify-rustdoc-zulip-on-backport-nominations, r=GuillaumeGomez meta: notify #t-rustdoc Zulip stream on backport nominations In July '23, it was decided to handle rustdoc-specific backport nominations in t-rustdoc meetings going forward ([Zulip announcement](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/T-rustdoc.20backports/near/374828518)). However, t-rustdoc meetings are far too infrequent for them to address nominations on time (contrary to the weekly t-compiler meetings). Hence GuillaumeGomez and I came to the conclusion that {beta,stable}-nominated rustdoc PRs should be dealt with on a case by case basis, e.g. on Zulip. This PR attempts to partially automate this process. ~~Sadly, `triagebot` is not quite as flexible has I've hoped. Blocked on `triagebot` improvements (see the `FIXME`s in this PR).~~ (Fixed in rust-lang/triagebot#1791). r? GuillaumeGomez
RalfJung
pushed a commit
to RalfJung/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2024
…t-nominations, r=GuillaumeGomez meta: notify #t-rustdoc Zulip stream on backport nominations In July '23, it was decided to handle rustdoc-specific backport nominations in t-rustdoc meetings going forward ([Zulip announcement](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/T-rustdoc.20backports/near/374828518)). However, t-rustdoc meetings are far too infrequent for them to address nominations on time (contrary to the weekly t-compiler meetings). Hence GuillaumeGomez and I came to the conclusion that {beta,stable}-nominated rustdoc PRs should be dealt with on a case by case basis, e.g. on Zulip. This PR attempts to partially automate this process. ~~Sadly, `triagebot` is not quite as flexible has I've hoped. Blocked on `triagebot` improvements (see the `FIXME`s in this PR).~~ (Fixed in rust-lang/triagebot#1791). r? GuillaumeGomez
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This would unblock rust-lang/rust#116957:
Hard Requirements:
We would like to
@*T-rustdoc*),#NNN),Problems:
Example: Here, you can see that neither
@*T-rustdoc*nor#123905got autolinked.Solution:
Send two separate Zulip messages. This requires modifications to triagebot.
This PR enables users to specify a sequence of strings for the fields
notify-zulip.⟨label⟩.message_on_⟨add|remove|close|reopen⟩in order to make triagebot post a sequence of Zulip messages. For backward compatibility, you can still specify a single string. I haven't renamed any of the fields (likemessage_on_$tomessages_on_$) to avoid churn. A bare string gets treated as a sequence of length 1 containing that very string.In TypeScript syntax, I've relaxed the type of the optional (!) fields
message_on_$fromstring | nulltostring | string[] | null.r? @Mark-Simulacrum or infra